Supreme Court’s Restraint On Gyakye Quayson A Long-Standing Position Of The Law - Dame

Supreme Court’s Restraint On Gyakye Quayson A Long-Standing Position Of The Law - Dame

 

 

The Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Godfred Dame, is satisfied with Supreme Court’s ruling restricting Mr James Gyakye Quayson from holding himself as the Member of Parliament for the Assin North Constituency. Speaking after the ruling, Mr. Dame said the ruling is an affirmation of law establishing principles by the Supreme

 

Court. Adamu Daramani Sakande found himself in a similar situation. He was also not qualified by the time nominations were then opened and was subsequently declared ineligible and for that matter, his seat was taken away. There has to be an even application of the law. If it happened to Daramani Sakande of the NPP, it should

 

 

happen to a gentleman of the NDC who finds himself in the same situation. Touching on the fate of Assin North constituents, Mr. Dame said he does not think that their rights to representation have also been interrupted. The Supreme Court has always exercised its powers to grant an injunction in constitutional matters. In the 1996, the

 

 

Supreme Court granted an injunction against the NPP in the case of Rosemary Quarm. NPP was injuncted from proceeding to elect a candidate. It is a Court of Law and equity, and therefore it also has the right to determine whether to grant injunctions when constitutions are breached or not. Each passing day Mr. Gyakeye Quayson

 

 

holds himself as MP for Assin North, the constitution is breached, he further argued. The Supreme Court on Wednesday, April 13, 2022, restrained James Gyakye Quayson from holding himself as the Member of Parliament for the Assin North constituency. This decision was taken in a petition brought before the

 

 

Supreme Court by Michael Ankomah Nimfa, a resident of Assin Bereku in the Central Region. The petitioner had earlier secured a judgment at the Cape Coast High Court overturning the election of Mr. Quayson as null and void, but the embattled legislator ran to the Court of Appeal to also have the decision set aside. Mr. Ankomah-Ninfa is

 

 

challenging the eligibility of Mr. Quayson as the MP for Assin North following allegations that he held dual citizenship prior to contesting the MP position. Although the Court of Appeal dismissed his case, Mr. Quayson subsequently went to the Supreme Court to have his issue resolved. Michael Ankomah-Nimfah also took the

 

 

issue to the Supreme Court to seek interpretation of Article 94(2)(a) of the 1992 Constitution. In the same case, Michael also asked the apex court to place an injunction on Mr. Quayson from holding himself as the MP for Assin North until the final determination of the case.