Nigeria: Dutch Court Orders Shell To Pay Nigerian Farmers Over Oil Spills

Court of Appeal in The Hague rules the multinational’s Nigerian subsidiary must payout over a 2008 case.

Nigeria: Dutch Court Orders Shell To Pay Nigerian Farmers Over Oil Spills
Leaking oil pipelines are a big problem in the Niger Delta region, the heart of the Nigerian oil industry

 

 

A Dutch court has ordered the Nigerian subsidiary of Shell to pay compensation over oil spills in Nigeria’s Niger Delta, a ruling which could pave the way for more cases against multinational oil firms. The Court of Appeal in The Hague on Friday ruled that the Nigerian arm of the British Dutch company must issue payouts over a long running civil case involving four Nigerian

 

farmers who were seeking compensation and a clean up from the company over pollution caused by leaking oil pipelines. It held Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary liable for two leaks that spewed oil over an area of a total of about 60 football pitches in two villages, saying that it could not be established beyond a reasonable doubt that saboteurs were to blame. The Hague appeals court

 

 

ruled that sabotage was to blame for an oil leak in another village; however, it said that the issue of whether Shell can be held liable remains open and the case will be continued as the court wants clarification about the extent of the pollution and whether it still has to be cleaned up. Under Nigerian law, which was applied in the Dutch civil case, the company is not liable if the

 

 

leaks were the result of sabotage. Shell Nigeria is sentenced to compensate farmers for damages, the court said in its ruling, which can be appealed via the Dutch Supreme Court. The amount of compensation will be established at a later date. The court did not specify how many of the four farmers would receive compensation. The court did not hold Shell’s parent

 

 

company which is headquartered in the Netherlands, directly responsible. However, it ruled that Shell’s parent company and its Nigerian subsidiary must fit a leak-detection system to a pipeline that caused one of the spills. Although only Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary was found responsible, the decision could pave the way for more environmental cases against the company. The verdict would be greeted with relief and joy by farmers

 

 

in Nigeria and could open the floodgates for many other similar cases. Hundreds of people have queued up to sue shell for contaminating the Niger Delta, Idris said, citing cases brought against Shell in the UK and the Netherlands. I spoke to an activist a short while ago who said, This is just the beginning and a lot of analysts also believe it the ruling will open the floodgates to so many litigations against oil production companies that have been operating in Nigeria.

 

Tears of joy

The case was initiated in 2008 by the farmers and the Friends of the Earth campaign group, who were seeking reparations for lost income from contaminated land and waterways in the Niger Delta region, the heart of the Nigerian oil industry and the spills concerned were between 2004 and 2007, but pollution from leaking oil

 

 

pipelines remains a big problem in Niger Delta. Tears of joy here. After 13 years, we’ve won, the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth tweeted following Friday’s ruling. Donald Pols, head of the NGO’s Dutch branch, described court’s decision as fantastic news for the environment and people living in developing countries. It means

 

 

the people in developing countries can take on the multinationals who do them harm, he said. Shell argued that saboteurs were responsible for the leaks in underground oil pipes that have polluted the delta. The company also argued that it should not be held legally responsible in the Netherlands for the actions of a foreign subsidiary, meaning Shell Nigeria.

 

 

Shell discovered and started exploiting Nigeria’s vast oil reserves in the late 1950s

 

 

Shell said in a statement following the ruling that it continues to believe the spills were caused by sabotage adding it was dismayed that the firm’s Nigerian subsidy the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria SPDC was judged to be culpable. We are disappointed that this court has made a different

 

 

finding on the cause of these spills and in its finding that SPDC is liable, the company said. The Nigerian subsidiary added: Like all Shell-operated ventures globally, we are committed to operating safely and protecting the local environment. Shell discovered and started exploiting Nigeria’s vast oil reserves in the late

 

 

1950s and has faced heavy criticism from activists and local communities over spills and for the company’s close ties to government security forces Friends of the Earth which has supported the Nigerian farmers in their legal battle argues that leaking pipes are caused by poor maintenance and inadequate security and that Shell does not do enough to clean up spills.